Lesson 3 · 7 min
Practice
Decide what good looks like
Turn a vague request into observable quality checks before reviewing the output.
Module: Judge and hand off. Decide what good looks like and keep the final decision with an accountable person.
What matters
- Define correctness and usefulness separately.
- Make unsupported claims visible rather than hiding uncertainty.
Your turn
Write a response you can review
List four checks you would use to judge a source-linked change summary before anyone acts on it.
Your response is not saved. Do not enter personal, confidential, secret, or regulated information.
Compare against these criteria
- Checks source traceability
- Checks factual accuracy
- Checks user usefulness
- Handles uncertainty explicitly
Self-review feedback
Your response is ready for comparison
Check each criterion against what you wrote. The Academy does not score or transmit this response.
View a worked response
Every proposed change links to the current policy source; quotations and dates match that source; the summary explains the operational effect for the policy owner; and missing or conflicting evidence is marked for human follow-up rather than resolved by assumption.